Thick vs Thin film comparison: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:08, 14 February 2025

Navigation
>Main Malaria Index
>>Thick film - main page
>>>Current page: Thick film vs thin film

Relative merits of thick or thin films in malaria diagnosis

Feature	Thick Film	Thin Film

Sensitivity for detection	Higher: detects low parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL	Lower: generally needs ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection)
Species Identification	Poor: RBC morphology lost and species-specific features may be difficult	Excellent: Parasite morphology and RBC characteristics are readily observed
Quantification of parasitaemia	Difficult: requires estimation so is imprecise	Easier: parasites can be counted per number of RBCs
Preparation and staining	Longer: requires air drying before careful staining to avoid artefact	Faster: films are fixed and stained immediately with clearer morphology

TABLE: A COMPARISON OF THICK AND THIN FILMS

1. Sensitivity for detection
Thick film: Higher - can detect lower levels of parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL
Thin film: Lower - generally requires ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection
2. Species Identification
Poor: poor - red cell morphology is lost and species-specific features may not be seen
Thin film: Good - both parasite morphology and RBC characteristics are assessed

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 | Thin film: Lower - generally requires ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection
 |-
-!'''1. Sensitivity for detection'''
+!'''2. Species Identification'''
 |-
-| Thick film: Higher - can detect lower levels of parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL
+| Poor: poor - red cell morphology is lost and species-specific features may not be seen
 |-
-| Thin film: Lower - generally requires ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection
+| Thin film: Good - both parasite morphology and RBC characteristics are assessed
 |}
 ----