Thick vs Thin film comparison: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:00, 14 February 2025

Navigation
>Main Malaria Index
>>Thick film - main page
>>>Current page: Thick film vs thin film

Relative merits of thick or thin films in malaria diagnosis

Feature	Thick Film	Thin Film

Sensitivity for detection	Higher: detects low parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL	Lower: generally needs ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection)
Species Identification	Poor: RBC morphology lost and species-specific features may be difficult	Excellent: Parasite morphology and RBC characteristics are readily observed
Quantification of parasitaemia	Difficult: requires estimation so is imprecise	Easier: parasites can be counted per number of RBCs
Preparation and staining	Longer: requires air drying before careful staining to avoid artefact	Faster: films are fixed and stained immediately with clearer morphology

COMPARISON OF THICK AND THIN FILMS
1. Sensitivity for detection
Thick film: Higher - can detect lower levels of parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL
Thin film: Lower - generally requires ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 {| class="wikitable" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; color:black"
-!colspan="3" style = "background:#e1f1fd; border:solid; border-width: 4px; color:navy"|<span style="font-size:90%;">'''COMPARISON OF THICK AND THIN FILMS'''</span></br>
+!colspan="3" style = "background:light gray; border:solid; border-width: 4px; color:black"|<span style="font-size:90%;">'''COMPARISON OF THICK AND THIN FILMS'''</span></br>
 |-
 !'''1. Sensitivity for detection'''