Practical reasons for test failure: Difference between revisions
From MalariaETC
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<span style="font-size:90%">'''1. Selection and procurement of MDTs'''</br> | <span style="font-size:90%">'''1. Selection and procurement of MDTs'''</br> | ||
<span style="font-size:90%">(a) Quality of test design/production. | <span style="font-size:90%">(a) Quality of test design/production. Historically there was significant variation of performance between tests and batches, this has been greatly improved with the WHO pre-qualification testing program that requires a minimum standard of performant, however users are still advised to check the performance of their selected test (see WHO testing information ref 2 above)</br>(b) Lot variability. Variability between different production batches has been observed and should be considered if RDT performance is less good than expected.</br> | ||
<span style="font-size:90%">'''2. Stability and storage issues'''</br> | <span style="font-size:90%">'''2. Stability and storage issues'''</br> | ||
Revision as of 10:33, 9 October 2024
Navigation
Main Malaria Index
>RDT main page
>>Single Band Tests
>>>Current page: Reasons for Test Failure
| Practical considerations and reasons for test failure
(a) Quality of test design/production. Historically there was significant variation of performance between tests and batches, this has been greatly improved with the WHO pre-qualification testing program that requires a minimum standard of performant, however users are still advised to check the performance of their selected test (see WHO testing information ref 2 above) 2. Stability and storage issues (a) RDTs typically have a shelf-life of 18–24 months providing storage is appropriateR. 3. Operator training (a)Problems in test usage may include inappropriate placement of test reagents or blood sample on RDT. |