RDT test: formats of tests: Difference between revisions
From MalariaETC
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<span style="font-size:90%">'''RDT Test Formats'''</br></span> | <span style="font-size:90%">'''RDT Test Formats'''</br></span> | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="widthe:90%; border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; border-color: | {| class="wikitable" style="widthe:90%; border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; border-color:navy" | ||
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:120%; color:black; background: FFFAFA"|<span style="color:navy>''''''</span> | |colspan="1" style = "font-size:120%; color:black; background: FFFAFA"|<span style="color:navy>''''''</span> | ||
Revision as of 17:22, 27 September 2024
RDT Test Formats
| '
Single test-band RDT tests This test format usually uses a species specific antibody recognising P.falciparum (the HRP2 antigen or Pf-LDH). These tests detect infection by P.falciparum only. The format offers particular advantages:
Multi-band RDT tests These use two (or occasionally more) test bands together with a control band. Most often one band is a species-specific antibody that identifies the dominant (or most important) species for the selected region (generally P.falciparum but in saome areas P.vivax). The second band is most often a pan-malaria antibody. The format offers advantages:
However, the limitations of this test form must be understood by users. In particular the poor sensitivity of pan-malarial antibodies for some species (P.ovale or P.malariae). In some circumstances RDT tests have been adapted to overcome particular problems, some are described here: Emerging strategies and options |