|
|
| Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| !'''1. Sensitivity for detection''' | | !'''1. Sensitivity for detection''' |
| |- | | |- |
| | Thick film: Higher - detects low parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL | | | Thick film: Higher - can detect lower levels of parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL |
| |- | | |- |
| | Thin film: Lower - generally needs ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection) | | | Thin film: Lower - generally requires ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection |
| |} | | |} |
| ---- | | ---- |
Revision as of 11:04, 13 February 2025
Navigation
>Main Malaria Index
>>Malaria Biology Index
>>>Current page: Initial infection
Relative merits of thick or thin films in malaria diagnosis
COMPARISON OF THICK AND THIN FILMS
|
| Feature |
Thick Film |
Thin Film
|
| Sensitivity for detection |
Higher: detects low parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL |
Lower: generally needs ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection)
|
| Species Identification |
Poor: RBC morphology lost and species-specific features may be difficult |
Excellent: Parasite morphology and RBC characteristics are readily observed
|
| Quantification of parasitaemia |
Difficult: requires estimation so is imprecise |
Easier: parasites can be counted per number of RBCs
|
| Preparation and staining |
Longer: requires air drying before careful staining to avoid artefact |
Faster: films are fixed and stained immediately with clearer morphology
|
COMPARISON OF THICK AND THIN FILMS
|
| 1. Sensitivity for detection
|
| Thick film: Higher - can detect lower levels of parasitaemia ~5–10 parasites/µL
|
| Thin film: Lower - generally requires ~50 parasites/µL for reliable detection
|
|