Actions

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs): Difference between revisions

From MalariaETC

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''OVERVIEW'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''OVERVIEW'''
|}
|}
RDTs detect malarial parasite antigens in the blood of infected individuals. Precise test formats can differ according to manufacturer and purpose, but follow similar principles using either a plastic cassette or a folding card. The simplest format (with a single test and control line) is shown below.
RDTs detect malarial parasite antigens in the blood of infected individuals. Precise test formats can differ according to manufacturer and purpose, but follow similar principles using either a plastic cassette or a folding card. The simplest format (with a single test and control line) is shown below.</br>
<gallery mode="nolines" widths=200px heights=300px>
<gallery mode="nolines" widths=200px heights=300px>
File:0 PF_RDT.jpg|<span style="font-size:90%"></span>|link={{filepath:0 PF_RDT.jpg}}
File:0 PF_RDT.jpg|<span style="font-size:90%"></span>|link={{filepath:0 PF_RDT.jpg}}
</gallery>
</gallery></br>
<span style="font-size:90%">Essentially, a lysis '''buffer''' will be introduced to the test through one window and a '''sample''' of blood is introduced into the second window. The interaction between buffer and sample will breakdown the red cells and any malaria parasites; this lysed sample they will diffuse along the strip where labelled antibodies will be used to detect the presence of parasites, forming a visible band in one or more test windows ('''T'''). Successful test performance will be shown by the appearance of a control band ('''C'''). </span>  
<span style="font-size:90%">Essentially, a lysis '''buffer''' is introduced to one window and a '''sample''' of blood into the second window. The interaction between buffer and sample breaks down the red cells and any malaria parasites present; the "lysed" sample then diffuses along the strip encountering labelled antibodies that detect the presence of parasites, forming a visible band in one or more test windows ('''T'''). Successful test performance will be shown by the appearance of a control band ('''C'''). </span>  
</br>
</br>


Line 26: Line 26:
|}
|}


<span style="font-size:90%">It is essential to appreciate that RDT tests meet a specific task:</br>
<span style="font-size:90%">'''RDTs provide a rapid means to indicate the possible presence or absence of malaria infection but should never be considered to a "gold standard" test'''
'''RDTs provide a rapid means to indicate the possible presence or absence of malaria infection'''


While in some circumstances they are the only choice, RDTs should never be considered to a "gold standard" test, and the significant issues with particular speces and with low parasite counts must be recognised. Briefly:
In brief:


<span style="font-size:90%">'''1. Tests made vary in quality or sensitivity:''' varying by manufacturer or batch variation (see the World Health Organisation performance evaluation).</span>
<span style="font-size:90%">'''1. Tests vary in quality:''' both manufacturer and batch variation (see the World Health Organisation performance evaluation).</span></br>
<span style="font-size:90%">'''2. Practicalities are vital to performance:''' incorrect storage, use or reading are each important causes of test failure world-wide.</span></br>
<span style="font-size:90%">'''2. Practicalities are vital:''' incorrect storage, use or reading are major causes of test failure world-wide.</span></br>
<span style="font-size:90%">'''3. Sensitivity and false positive rates vary between species and test:''' be aware of the limitations of your selected test..</br></span>
<span style="font-size:90%">'''3. Performance varies between species and design:''' be aware of the limitations of your selected test..</br></span>


<span style="font-size:90%">The sensitivities of RDT tests accross species are broadly summarised below ('''note''' these are for general guidance only since performance may vary between test types and conditions:</span>
<span style="font-size:90%">A broad summary is given below ('''note''' these are for general guidance only since performance may vary between test types and conditions)</span>





Revision as of 11:49, 12 August 2024


Navigation
Return to Main index


OVERVIEW

RDTs detect malarial parasite antigens in the blood of infected individuals. Precise test formats can differ according to manufacturer and purpose, but follow similar principles using either a plastic cassette or a folding card. The simplest format (with a single test and control line) is shown below.


Essentially, a lysis buffer is introduced to one window and a sample of blood into the second window. The interaction between buffer and sample breaks down the red cells and any malaria parasites present; the "lysed" sample then diffuses along the strip encountering labelled antibodies that detect the presence of parasites, forming a visible band in one or more test windows (T). Successful test performance will be shown by the appearance of a control band (C).


THE BASICS

RDTs provide a rapid means to indicate the possible presence or absence of malaria infection but should never be considered to a "gold standard" test

In brief:

1. Tests vary in quality: both manufacturer and batch variation (see the World Health Organisation performance evaluation).
2. Practicalities are vital: incorrect storage, use or reading are major causes of test failure world-wide.
3. Performance varies between species and design: be aware of the limitations of your selected test..

A broad summary is given below (note these are for general guidance only since performance may vary between test types and conditions)


P.falciparum1
At high parasitaemia expect high sensitivity (90-95%). This declines when parasite levels are lower (45-70%)2
P.vivax
Expect moderate to high sensitivity at high parasitaemia (70-90%). This declines markedly when parasite levels are lower (30-60%)2
P.ovale & P.malarae
Generally sensitivity is poor (approximately half the sensitivity shown for P.vivax)
P.knowlesi3
Reports suggest variable sensitivity that may depend on test used, RDTs may detect this species well when parasitaemia is high.

Notes:
1 HRP2 mutation mean that in some geographical areas the diagnostic sensitivity may be significantlu lower (see below)
2 Low parasite number is considered as (<1000 parasites/μL) a level that may cause symptoms in children or non-immune travellers
3 There have been relatively few studies with this species so caution is required in RDT interpretation

THE ANTIGENS


Tests from differert manufacurers recognise different malarial antigens. These have different different benefits or drawbacks. You should be aware of these when interpreting results:


1. Species-specific antigens: these detect individual malaria species

*Histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2): specific for P.falciparum - Click for details
*Species-specific forms of lactate dehydrogenase: principally either P.falciparum or P.vivax Click for details


2. Pan-specific antigens: these detect the presence of any malaria species

*Pan-specific Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (PpanLDH): a form of LDH that is present in all malaria species Click for details
*Pan-Plasmodium Aldolase Antigen (Aldolase): a malaria-specific form of aldolase that is present in all species Click for details


TEST FORMATS

The following formats are available:

Single band tests (comprising a single test band and a control) (image)

  • simplicity and lower cost
  • suitable only where there is a sigle dominant malaria species.

The single secies P.falciparum diagnostic test has been successfully applied in Africa areas where infections with this species account for more than 95% of infections.

Multi-band tests: the most frequent form identifies the dominant or most important species with a species-specific band for the selected region, then a second band idetifies antigens expressed by all malaria species. Two formats are used:

PF/general PV/general

Test selection


INTERPRETATION and PROBLEMS