RDT Performance issues Index: Difference between revisions
From MalariaETC
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}} ---- <span style="font-size:90%">back</span></br> ---- {| class="wikitable" style="widthe:90%; border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; border-color:teal" |colspan="1" style = "font-size:140%; color:black; background: FFFAFA"|<span style="color:black>'''Poor performance of RDT tests'''</span> ---- <span style="font-size:90%>") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
<span style="font-size:90%> | <span style="font-size:90%">'''1. Selection and procurement of MDTs'''</br> | ||
<span style="font-size:90%">(a) Quality of test design/production. Historically there was significant variation of performance between tests and batches, this has been greatly improved with the WHO pre-qualification testing program that requires a minimum standard of performant, however users are still advised to check the performance of their selected test (see WHO testing information ref 2 above)</br>(b) Lot variability. Variability between different production batches has been observed and should be considered if RDT performance is less good than expected.</br> | |||
<span style="font-size:90%">'''2. Stability and storage issues'''</br> | |||
<span style="font-size:90%">(a) RDTs typically have a shelf-life of 18–24 months providing storage is appropriate.</br>(b) Tests can suffer degradation if stored in inappropriate heat or humidity: generally tests are stable in the range 2–30°C or higher, but these limits may be exceeded in many countries, and continuous product refrigeration to the point of use may not be guaranteed in developing countries. | |||
<span style="font-size:90%">'''3. Operator training'''</br> | |||
<span style="font-size:90%">(a)Problems in test usage may include inappropriate placement of test reagents or blood sample on RDT.</br>(b)Poor interpretation of faint lines.</br>(c) Inadequate training or reference materials | |||
Revision as of 17:56, 5 December 2024
| Poor performance of RDT tests
1. Selection and procurement of MDTs (a) Quality of test design/production. Historically there was significant variation of performance between tests and batches, this has been greatly improved with the WHO pre-qualification testing program that requires a minimum standard of performant, however users are still advised to check the performance of their selected test (see WHO testing information ref 2 above) 2. Stability and storage issues (a) RDTs typically have a shelf-life of 18–24 months providing storage is appropriate. 3. Operator training (a)Problems in test usage may include inappropriate placement of test reagents or blood sample on RDT. |