Actions

RDT Quiz A Q3: Difference between revisions

From MalariaETC

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
{<span style="font-size:90%">Which of the following interpretions can be made? (select one or more options)</span></br></br>
{<span style="font-size:90%">Which of the following interpretions can be made? (select one or more options)</span></br></br>
|type="[]"}
|type="[]"}
{'''When comparing RDT tests and morphology in the diagnosis of malaria which statements are true?'''</br></br>
{<span style="font-size:90%">'''When comparing RDT tests and morphology in the diagnosis of malaria which statements are true?'''</br></br>
|type="[]"}
|type="[]"}
- RDT tests offer superior species identification compared with microscopy
- <span style="font-size:90%">RDT gives superior species identification
+ Well-trained microscopists diagnose malaria with equivalent or better sensitivity than RDT
+ <span style="font-size:90%">Good microscopy is more sensitivity than RDT
+ MDT tests offer a more rapid initial diagnosis
+ <span style="font-size:90%">MDT tests offer a more rapid initial diagnosis
+ RDT tests may be a preferred choice in some low-income countries
+ <span style="font-size:90%">RDT tests may be a preferred choice in some low-income countries
- RDT tests provide a more accurate assessment of the % of infected red cells  
- <span style="font-size:90%">RDT tests provide a more accurate assessment of the % of infected red cells  
</quiz>
</quiz>



Revision as of 11:19, 25 November 2024


Go to Previous Question

RDT Quiz A Q2


Shown below is an RDT test. This uses a pan-malarial antibody (labelled Pan) and a P.falciparum species-specific antibody (labelled Sp). The test has been used to assess a patient and the positive bands are shown on the figure.

Which of the following interpretions can be made? (select one or more options)

RDT gives superior species identification
Good microscopy is more sensitivity than RDT
MDT tests offer a more rapid initial diagnosis
RDT tests may be a preferred choice in some low-income countries
RDT tests provide a more accurate assessment of the % of infected red cells


Explanation of correct answer (click "Expand")
In ideal conditions a well-trained microscopist with experience in malaria, viewing a well-prepared thick blood film using a good quality microscope may detect with equal or better sensitivity than an RDT test.

In less ideal conditions where equipment, staining quality, or microscopic experience is less good, then RDTs may have equivalent or superior sensitivity to microscopy (including many malarial endemic regions where microscopy may be unavailable or where the sensitivity of microscopy is limited by training, equipment or facilities). RDTs aso provide a more rapid turnaround time allowing emergency use and rapid decision-making.


For species identification thin films are preferred to thick films or RTDS (including mixed infections), as they also allow more accurate identification of sepecies and the % of infected red-cells (for P.falciparum or P.knowlesi).


Go to next question (4 of 5)