RDT test: formats of tests: Difference between revisions
From MalariaETC
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
</gallery></br> | </gallery></br> | ||
<span style="font-size:90%">This test format usually uses a species specific | <span style="font-size:90%">This test format usually uses a species-specific antibodies recognising ''P.falciparum'' (the HRP2 antigen or Pf-LDH). These tests detect infection by ''P.falciparum'' only. The format offers particular advantages:</span> | ||
*<span style="font-size:90%">Simple interpretation | *<span style="font-size:90%">Simple interpretation | ||
*<span style="font-size:90%">lower production cost | *<span style="font-size:90%">lower production cost | ||
Revision as of 18:26, 22 March 2025
Navigation
Main Malaria Index
>RDT main page
>>This page: RDT Formats
RDT Test Formats
|
Single test-band RDT tests This test format usually uses a species-specific antibodies recognising P.falciparum (the HRP2 antigen or Pf-LDH). These tests detect infection by P.falciparum only. The format offers particular advantages:
Multi-band RDT tests These use two (or occasionally more) test bands together with a control band. Most often one band is a species-specific antibody that identifies the dominant (or most important) species for the selected region (generally P.falciparum but in saome areas P.vivax). The second band is most often a pan-malaria antibody. The format offers advantages:
However, the limitations of this test form must be understood by users. In particular the poor sensitivity of pan-malarial antibodies for some species (P.ovale or P.malariae). Additional note: |