Practical reasons for test failure: Difference between revisions
From MalariaETC
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="widthe:90%; border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; border-color:teal" | {| class="wikitable" style="widthe:90%; border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; border-color:teal" | ||
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:140%; color:black; background: FFFAFA"|<span style="color:black>'''Practical considerations '''</span> | |colspan="1" style = "font-size:140%; color:black; background: FFFAFA"|<span style="color:black>'''Practical considerations and reasons for test failure'''</span> | ||
<span style="font-size:90%">Bibilography: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652944/], [https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/case-management/diagnosis/rapid-diagnostic-tests]</span> | <span style="font-size:90%">Bibilography: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652944/], [https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/case-management/diagnosis/rapid-diagnostic-tests]</span> | ||
Revision as of 12:22, 30 September 2024
Navigation
Main Malaria Index
RDT main page
>RDT Test Design
>>Current page: Reasons for Test Failure
| Practical considerations and reasons for test failure
(a) Quality of test design/production. There may be significant variation of performance between tests, users are advised to check test performance (see WHO testing information ref 2 above) 2. Stability and storage issues (a) RDTs typically have a shelf-life of 18–24 months providing storage is appropriateR. 3. Operator training (a)Problems in test usage may include inappropriate placement of test reagents or blood sample on RDT. |