Actions

RDT test: formats of tests: Difference between revisions

From MalariaETC

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
----
'''Navigation'''</br>
<span style="font-size:90%">[[Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)|Go back]]''</span></br>
----
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''TEST FORMATS'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''TEST FORMATS'''

Revision as of 09:52, 24 September 2024


Navigation
Go back


TEST FORMATS


Single test-band RDT tests


This test format usually uses the HRP2 antigen to detect P.falciparum and offers particular advantages:

  • simplicity of interpretation
  • lower production cost
  • stability for storage and transport
  • valuable where a single malaria species dominates.


Use: The single species test for P.falciparum is very useful in Africa areas where infections with this species account for more than 95% of infections and may be used where technical expertise is less available. However, this is at the cost missing less prevelant species, and the lack of a pan-malaria antibody means that cases with HRP2-gene delection may be missed.



Multi-band RDT tests


These use two (or occasionally more) test bands together with a control band.

Most often one band is a species-specific antibody that identifies the dominant (or most important) species for the selected region. The second band generally employs a pan-malaria antibody that may' detect other species. The most frequent format is P.falciparum-specific combined with a Pan-malaria-specific antibdy.

This format can be very effective providing its' limitations are understood by users. In particular the poor sensitivity of pan-malarial antibodies for some species.

less common strategies