General and specific limitations of RDT tests: Difference between revisions
From MalariaETC
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:blasck; background: FFFAFA"|<span style="color:navy>'''Practical considerations '''</span> | |colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:blasck; background: FFFAFA"|<span style="color:navy>'''Practical considerations '''</span> | ||
RDT evaluationby WHO requires tests to identify 75% of cases there are 200 parasites/μl. It is important to note however that fevers may be present at lower parasite levels (particularly in non-immune travellers). Therefore, for the detection of ''P.falciparum'' using approved tests, the lower limits of detection are not sufficient to confidently exclude infection. For non-falciparum species tests are less reliable. | |||
Revision as of 14:25, 13 September 2024
Navigation
Go Back
| Practical considerations
RDT evaluationby WHO requires tests to identify 75% of cases there are 200 parasites/μl. It is important to note however that fevers may be present at lower parasite levels (particularly in non-immune travellers). Therefore, for the detection of P.falciparum using approved tests, the lower limits of detection are not sufficient to confidently exclude infection. For non-falciparum species tests are less reliable. |