Practical reasons for poor RDT performance: Difference between revisions
From MalariaETC
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}} | |||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Navigation'''</br> | '''Navigation'''</br> | ||
[[Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)| | <span style="font-size:90%">[[MalariaETC Index|Main Malaria Index]]''</span></br> | ||
<span style="font-size:90%">>[[Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)|RDT main page]]''</span></br> | |||
<span style="font-size:90%">>>[[Interpretation guide: SINGLE BAND tests|Single Band Tests]]''</span></br> | |||
<span style="font-size:90%">>>>Current page: '''Practical reasons for test failure'''</span> | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 16:05, 6 October 2024
Navigation
Main Malaria Index
>RDT main page
>>Single Band Tests
>>>Current page: Practical reasons for test failure
| Practical considerations
(a) Quality of test design/production. There may be significant variation of performance between tests, users are advised to check test performance (see WHO testing information ref 2 above) 2. Stability and storage issues (a) RDTs typically have a shelf-life of 18–24 months providing storage is appropriateR. 3. Operator training (a)Problems in test usage may include inappropriate placement of test reagents or blood sample on RDT. |