Actions

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs): Difference between revisions

From MalariaETC

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(84 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
----
<span style="font-size:90%">'''Navigation:''' [[MalariaETC Index|Return to Main Malaria Index]]''</span></br>
'''Navigation'''</br>
<span style="font-size:90%">[[MalariaETC Index|Return to Main index]]''</span></br>


----
----
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''OVERVIEW'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''OVERVIEW OF RDT TESTS'''
|}
|}
<span style="font-size:90%">RDTs detect malarial parasite antigens in the blood of infected individuals. Precise test formats can differ according to manufacturer and purpose, but follow similar principles using either a plastic cassette or a folding card. The simplest format (with a single test and control line) is shown below.</br></span>
<span style="font-size:90%">RDT tests use antibodies that recognise particular parasite proteins (antigens) allowing them to show whether malarial parasites  are present in the blood of the individual being tested. There are a range of forms for these tests, but the simplest format (with a single test and control line) is shown below.</br></br></span>
<gallery mode="nolines" widths=200px heights=300px>
<gallery mode="nolines" widths=150px heights=225px>
File:0 PF_RDT.jpg|<span style="font-size:90%"></span>|link={{filepath:0 PF_RDT.jpg}}
File:0 PF_RDT.jpg|<span style="font-size:90%"></span>|link={{filepath:0 PF_RDT.jpg}}
</gallery></br>
</gallery></br>
<span style="font-size:90%">Essentially, a lysis '''buffer''' is introduced to one window and a '''sample''' of blood into the second window. The interaction between buffer and sample breaks down the red cells and any malaria parasites present; the "lysed" sample then diffuses along the strip encountering labelled antibodies that detect the presence of parasites, forming a visible band in one or more test windows ('''T'''). Successful test performance will be shown by the appearance of a control band ('''C'''). </span>  
<span style="font-size:90%">Tests are supplied as a kit with a ''lysis buffer'' that is introduced to one ''window'' of the test as shown. A sample of blood from the patient is introduced into a second window. The interaction between buffer and sample breaks down the red cells and any malaria parasites present (lysis); this "lysed" sample then diffuses along the strip where it mixes with labelled-antibodies that detect the presence of parasites, if parasite proteins are present then the labelled antibody/antigen complex is "captured" and forms a visible band in one or more test windows ('''T'''). Successful test performance will be shown by the appearance of a control band ('''C'''). </span>  
</br>
 
<span style="font-size:200%">&#x2192;</span> [[RDT test: design and function|Click for more on how tests work]]
</br></div>


{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''TEST FORMATS'''
|}


<div style="width: 300px">
<span style="font-size:90%">Precise test formats can differ according to manufacturer and purpose, but all follow similar principles using either a plastic cassette or a folding card. Tests all have a control line (C) to confirm the test was correctly performed, in addition RDTs have one or more tests bands that allow detection of one or more parasite species (red).</br>The choice of best RDT format will depend on the particular parasites likely to be encountered, but also on local expertise (see additional information in link below).</br></br></span>
{| class="wikitable" style="border-left:solid 4px navy;border-right:solid 4px navy;border-top:solid 4px navy;border-bottom:solid 4px navy; font-size:90%; color:navy; align:center"
<gallery mode="nolines" widths=300px heights=80px>
| colspan="1"''|[[RDT test: design and function|Click for more detail on how the tests work]]''
File:RDT_single.jpg|<span style="font-size:90%"></span>Single band test|link={{filepath:RDT_single.jpg}}
File:RDT_multi.jpg|<span style="font-size:90%"></span>Multi-band test|link={{filepath:RDT_multi.jpg}}
</gallery>
<span style="font-size:200%">&#x2192;</span> [[RDT test: formats of tests|Click for more detail on test formats]]
</br></br>
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''HOW EFFECTIVE ARE RDT tests?'''
|}
|}
</br>
 
</div>
<span style="font-size:90%">RDTs provide a '''rapid''' result to indicate the '''possible''' presence or absence of malaria infection. In some circumstances they may be the only easily available test for malaria. However, RDT tests should never be considered a "gold standard" </span>
</br></br>
<span style="font-size:90%">The World Health Organisation requires that tests can identify at least 75% of cases which have a parasite concentration of 200 parasites/μl. However, fevers may be present at lower parasite levels (particularly in non-immune travellers). Therefore, for ''P.falciparum'' the detection limit of approved tests may not be sufficient to confidently exclude infection. For non-falciparum species tests are less reliable.</span></br>
 
<span style="font-size:200%">&#x2192;</span> [[How do RDT tests compare to microscopy?|Click for a comparison of RDT tests and microscopy]]
</br></br>


{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''THE BASICS'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''HOW WELL ARE DIFFERENT SPECIES DETECTED?'''
|}
|}


<span style="font-size:90%">'''NOTE''' RDTs provide a rapid means to indicate the '''possible''' presence or absence of malaria infection, and in some cases may be the only available test. However, they should never be considered a "gold standard" test, it is important that their limitations should be appreciated. Results '''should be confirmed by microscopy''' wherever this is possible.</span></br></br>In brief:
</b><span style="font-size:90%">The different malaria species are detected with different sensitivity. The table below provides an overall summary of the sensitivity that can be expected for RDT tests when suitable species-specific together with pan-malarial antibodies are used. The table is only a broad summary. Users are advised to understand the characteristics of the test they use including the merits of the antibodies employed in their test (see section below) </span></br></br>


<span style="font-size:90%">'''1. Tests vary in quality:''' both manufacturer and batch variation (see the World Health Organisation performance evaluation).</span></br>
<span style="font-size:90%">'''2. Practicalities are vital:''' incorrect storage, use or reading are major causes of test failure world-wide.</span></br>
<span style="font-size:90%">'''3. Performance varies between species and design:''' be aware of the limitations of your selected test..</br></span>
</br>
<span style="font-size:90%">The '''broad summary''' below applies when suitable species-specific together with pan-malaria antibodies (as appropriate) are used</span>
<div style="width: 95%; font-size:90%;">  
<div style="width: 95%; font-size:90%;">  
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; color:black"
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; color:black"
Line 55: Line 64:


<span style="font-size:80%">Notes:</br></span>
<span style="font-size:80%">Notes:</br></span>
<span style="font-size:80%"><sup>1</sup> HRP2 mutation mean that in some geographical areas the diagnostic sensitivity may be significantly lower (see below)</br></span>
<span style="font-size:80%"><sup>1</sup> HRP2 mutation mean that in some geographical areas the diagnostic sensitivity may be significantly lower for HRP2-based tests (see below)</br></span>
<span style="font-size:80%"><sup>2</sup> Low parasite number is considered as (<1000 parasites/μL) a level that may cause symptoms in children or non-immune travellers</br></span>
<span style="font-size:80%"><sup>2</sup> Low parasite number is considered as (<1000 parasites/μL) a level that may cause symptoms in children or non-immune travellers</br></span>
<span style="font-size:80%"><sup>3</sup> There have been relatively few studies with this species so caution is required in RDT interpretation</br></span>
<span style="font-size:80%"><sup>3</sup> There have been relatively few studies with this species so caution is required in RDT interpretation</br></span>
Line 61: Line 70:


{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''THE ANTIGENS'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''DOES THE ANTIGEN DETECTED BY THE RDT TEST MATTER?'''
|}
|}


<span style="font-size:90%">Yes, it is important to realise that the RDT tests produced by different manufacturers use antibodies that recognise recognise different malarial antigens. Different antigens have different strengths or drawbacks that may affect which test you select or how you use it.</br></br>It is important that you are aware of the benefits or drawbacks of the antigens used in the test you use.</span>


<span style="font-size:90%">Tests from different manufacturers recognise different malarial antigens. You should be aware of benefits or drawbacks of the antigens used in your test.</span>
<span style="font-size:200%">&#x2192;</span> [[RDT test: antigens|Click stengths and drawbacks of different test antigens]]</br></div>
 
<div style="width: 95%; font-size:90%;">
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 4px; color:black"
!colspan="1" style = "background:#e1f1fd; border:solid; border-width: 3px;"|<span style="font-size:90%;">'''1. Species-specific antigens:''' these detect individual malaria species</span></br>
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:white; border:solid; border-width: 1px; color:black"|histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2): specific for ''P.falciparum'' - [[Histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)|Click for details]]
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:white; border:solid; border-width: 1px; color:black"|Species-specific forms of lactate dehydrogenase: principally either ''P.falciparum'' or ''P.vivax''  [[Species-specific forms of lactate dehydrogenase (PfLDH and PvLDH)|Click for details]]
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:#e1f1fd; border:solid; border-width: 3px;"|<span style="font-size:90%;">'''2. Pan-specific antigens:''' these detect the presence of any malaria species</span></br>
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:white; border:solid; border-width: 1px; color:black"|Pan-specific antigens: Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase or Plasmodium aldolase [[(pan-specific antigens)|Click for details]]
|-
|}
</div>






{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''TEST FORMATS'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''INTERPRETATION'''
|}
|}


 
<span style="font-size:90%">The possible patterns seen on RDT tests are relatively simple, and in most cases the most probable diagnosis is clear. However, there may be alternative interpretations of band patters. The guides below are for the most common test formats, and most frequent band patters.
'''Single test-band RDT tests'''</br>
</br></br>
<gallery mode="nolines" widths=300px heights=80px>
<div style="width: 350px">
File:RDT_single.jpg|<span style="font-size:90%"></span>|link={{filepath:RDT_single.jpg}}
{| class="wikitable" style="border-left:solid 4px navy;border-right:solid 4px navy;border-top:solid 4px navy;border-bottom:solid 4px navy; font-size:100%; color:navy; align:center"
</gallery></br>
| colspan="1"''|[[Interpretation guide: SINGLE BAND tests|Interpretation guide: '''SINGLE BAND''' tests]]''
 
|}
These have a single test band (red arrow) and a control band (black arrow), and offer particular adantages:
</br>
 
{| class="wikitable" style="border-left:solid 4px navy;border-right:solid 4px navy;border-top:solid 4px navy;border-bottom:solid 4px navy; font-size:100%; color:navy; align:center"
*simplicity of interpretation
| colspan="1"''|[[Interpretation guide: MULTI BAND tests|Interpretation guide: '''MULTI BAND''' tests]]''
*lower production cost
|}
*most applicable where there is a single dominant malaria species.
</div>
 
</br></br>
 
'''USE:''' The single species test for ''P.falciparum'' has been successfully applied in Africa areas where infections with this species account for more than 95% of infections (remainder are not vivax) and may be used where technical expertise is lower.
 
Click for detail
 
----
 
'''Multi-band RDT tests'''</br>  
<gallery mode="nolines" widths=300px heights=80px>
File:RDT_multi.jpg|<span style="font-size:90%"></span>|link={{filepath:RDT_single.jpg}}
</gallery></br>
 
These use two (or occasionally more) test bands together with a control band.
 
'''USE''' Most often one band is a species-specific antibody that identifies the dominant (or most important) species for the selected region. The second band generally employs a pan-malaria antibody that may detect other species.
 
 
The most frequent format is ''P.falciparum''-specific combined with a ''Pan-malaria-specific''
 
 
 
Test selection
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
{| class="wikitable" style="border-style: none; border-width: 2px; border-color: gainsboro; color:black"
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''INTERPRETATION'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:100%; color:black; background: gainsboro |'''TEST MY KNOWLEDGE'''
|}
|}
 
<span style="font-size:90%">Would you like to test what you know?</br>
The possible patterns seen on RDT tests are relatively simple and the most probable diagnosis is generally clear. However, there are often alternative possible interpretations in many cases. The guides below are for the most common test formats, but may need to be adapted if you use a less common format.
<span style="font-size:200%">&#x2192;</span>[[RDT_Quiz_A_Q1|Click here]]
 
</div>
Interpretation of SINGLE BAND tests</br>
 
Interpretation of MULTI BAND tests</br>
 
----
 
 
 


----
----

Latest revision as of 22:50, 17 March 2025

Navigation: Return to Main Malaria Index


OVERVIEW OF RDT TESTS

RDT tests use antibodies that recognise particular parasite proteins (antigens) allowing them to show whether malarial parasites are present in the blood of the individual being tested. There are a range of forms for these tests, but the simplest format (with a single test and control line) is shown below.


Tests are supplied as a kit with a lysis buffer that is introduced to one window of the test as shown. A sample of blood from the patient is introduced into a second window. The interaction between buffer and sample breaks down the red cells and any malaria parasites present (lysis); this "lysed" sample then diffuses along the strip where it mixes with labelled-antibodies that detect the presence of parasites, if parasite proteins are present then the labelled antibody/antigen complex is "captured" and forms a visible band in one or more test windows (T). Successful test performance will be shown by the appearance of a control band (C).

Click for more on how tests work


TEST FORMATS

Precise test formats can differ according to manufacturer and purpose, but all follow similar principles using either a plastic cassette or a folding card. Tests all have a control line (C) to confirm the test was correctly performed, in addition RDTs have one or more tests bands that allow detection of one or more parasite species (red).
The choice of best RDT format will depend on the particular parasites likely to be encountered, but also on local expertise (see additional information in link below).

Click for more detail on test formats

HOW EFFECTIVE ARE RDT tests?

RDTs provide a rapid result to indicate the possible presence or absence of malaria infection. In some circumstances they may be the only easily available test for malaria. However, RDT tests should never be considered a "gold standard"

The World Health Organisation requires that tests can identify at least 75% of cases which have a parasite concentration of 200 parasites/μl. However, fevers may be present at lower parasite levels (particularly in non-immune travellers). Therefore, for P.falciparum the detection limit of approved tests may not be sufficient to confidently exclude infection. For non-falciparum species tests are less reliable.

Click for a comparison of RDT tests and microscopy

HOW WELL ARE DIFFERENT SPECIES DETECTED?

The different malaria species are detected with different sensitivity. The table below provides an overall summary of the sensitivity that can be expected for RDT tests when suitable species-specific together with pan-malarial antibodies are used. The table is only a broad summary. Users are advised to understand the characteristics of the test they use including the merits of the antibodies employed in their test (see section below)

P.falciparum1
At high parasitaemia expect high sensitivity (90-95%). This declines when parasite levels are lower (45-70%)2
P.vivax
Expect moderate to high sensitivity at high parasitaemia (70-90%). This declines markedly when parasite levels are lower (30-60%)2
P.ovale & P.malarae
Generally sensitivity is poor (approximately half the sensitivity shown for P.vivax)
P.knowlesi3
Reports suggest variable sensitivity that may depend on test used, RDTs are reported tp detect this species well when parasitaemia is high.

Notes:
1 HRP2 mutation mean that in some geographical areas the diagnostic sensitivity may be significantly lower for HRP2-based tests (see below)
2 Low parasite number is considered as (<1000 parasites/μL) a level that may cause symptoms in children or non-immune travellers
3 There have been relatively few studies with this species so caution is required in RDT interpretation

DOES THE ANTIGEN DETECTED BY THE RDT TEST MATTER?

Yes, it is important to realise that the RDT tests produced by different manufacturers use antibodies that recognise recognise different malarial antigens. Different antigens have different strengths or drawbacks that may affect which test you select or how you use it.

It is important that you are aware of the benefits or drawbacks of the antigens used in the test you use.

Click stengths and drawbacks of different test antigens


INTERPRETATION

The possible patterns seen on RDT tests are relatively simple, and in most cases the most probable diagnosis is clear. However, there may be alternative interpretations of band patters. The guides below are for the most common test formats, and most frequent band patters.



TEST MY KNOWLEDGE

Would you like to test what you know?
Click here